Skip to main content

Which is Correct: "Clap Him" or "Clap for Him"

WHICH IS CORRECT-CLAP HIM OR CLAP FOR HIM?

If you think ‘clap for him’ is correct but ‘clap him’ is not, this discourse is for you; if you think ‘clap for him’ sounds weird and ‘clap him” is the standard, this is also for you.

Confused? Don’t be. Take a deep breath and read on. We will look at how and where different speakers (who speak English as a primary language) use the above expression, with a new insight for everyone, no matter which style you use. Let’s get to it right away.

Every discourse I came across on this subject tends to be from a particular point of view (of a particular set of speakers), but we will pull them all together here. All facts are verifiable and credible.

‘Clap’ is both a noun and a verb. As a verb, it means to hit your hands together to make a short loud sound for attention, or admiration(applaud); to hit someone lightly to express pleasure; or to put someone or something somewhere quickly (e.g. They clapped him into the bunker). As a noun, it means the act of performing the above actions, or the sound of an explosion, especially thunder (e.g He was frightened by a clap of thunder).

The verb form of ‘clap’ in the context of ‘applaud’, used with or without ‘for’ + human names or personal pronouns (clap for + Nneka/him/her/them or clap + Nneka /him/her/them) is what has generated some divergence of opinions. The pattern is not the same for every native speaker of English because American English has a form of it and British has another, while Australians and Canadians follow one of these patterns, and one wonders why the other uses it differently. In British English (which we speak,) ‘clap’ is generally used without ‘for’ as a verb, but could be used with ‘for’ as a noun. This was directly confirmed by the British council and evident in the British National Corpus. Only one entry is found in the corpus where ‘clap’ (verb) was used with ‘for’ before a name (…let’s all clap for Neil…)

Examples:

1. We should clap Nefertiti for the accurate answer. (as a verb)

2. Let’s clap her for that wonderful performance. (as a verb)

3. Give a clap for Paul as he stands to discuss the subject. (as a noun)

In American English, as confirmed by native speakers and the Corpus of Contemporary American English, ‘clap for’ is both natural and acceptable.

Thus, the British form is not evident in the corpus.

Examples:

1. You can clap for me if you want to.

2. Christine decided to clap for the musician and we all joined to make him happy.

Similarly, the Corpus of Canadian English, The Australian Writer’s Marketplace Online and speakers from both countries (though Australia is also a continent) confirmed the use of ‘clap for’ naturally.

However, examples of ‘clap for’ (as used in American, Canadian and Australian English) are not seen in the Cambridge Dictionary, Oxford Dictionary, Macmillan Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Collins Dictionary. The related examples given are: clap him, clapped the marcher, clapped his performance, clapped for joy, etc.

Moreover, Cambridge Dictionary’s reply to my question was: "Yes, it does sound a little odd (the ‘for’ element). If you were asking an audience to applaud a guest, you’d more likely say something like ‘Please give x a big hand’ or ‘Please put your hands together for x’. You wouldn’t tend to use the word ‘clap’. If you were reporting what had happened, you would probably say something like ‘They clapped/applauded when x entered.’ So although ‘clap for’ isn’t absolutely wrong, it’s not quite natural sounding either.” Consequently, ‘give a big hand’, ‘a round of applause for’, ‘put your hands together for’, etc. have been suggested to escape this diversity, but we can’t run away from any aspect of language— it will always find us. In summary, these are the facts: renowned dictionaries support the British form as the standard (clap him/her; a clap for him/her) and find it unnatural to say ‘clap for him/her’; Americans, Canadians and Australians find it quite natural to say ‘clap for him/her’ and find the British form weird.

Now that you know…

Follow this blog website for more: Kingsleysunday430.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FIFA WORLD CUP 2018: List of all individual award winners

FIFA World Cup 2018: List of all individual award winners dailyactive.info Jul 16, 2018 10:09 AM The FIFA World Cup 2018 ended on Sunday at Luzhniki Stadium after a month of excitement and exhilaration. France won the World Cup for the second time and ended Croatia’s dream with a 4-2 victory in the finals. A total of 32 teams participated in the tournament and overall 169 goals were scored. Let’s take a look at the individual award winners declared after the final: GOLDEN BALL AWARD Midfielder Luka Modric on Sunday won the Golden Ball Award, becoming the first Croatian in World Cup history to do so. Modric led his team for the first time to the World Cup finals and he covered most distance in the entire 2018 WC. Eden Hazard stood second and Antoine Griezmann stood third in the list of tournament’s best players. YOUNG PLAYER AWARD France and Paris Saint-Germain forward Kylian Mbappe won the FIFA Young Player Award. The French teenager (19 years old) scor

EXTONS: The Best Exchange Platform

INTRODUCTION: It is a well-known fact that the world has become more and more reliant on the digital technology. Since the beginning of the online exchange era in the global market, the demand for online exchange platform has massively increase. Due to the high demand for online exchange platforms, many exchange platforms where created but it came with many problems and people began ro question its security, privacy, transparency etc Although great measures such as symmetric encryption are in place to make all activities in the financial market safe and secure, it is still vulnerable to hacking. Fraudsters, for instance, use phishing tools, phishing attacks to trick unsuspecting users into providing the log-in details of their e-wallets, online accounts and other important assets which they capture and use to access or hack in to the victims' personal and financial information. Inadequate authentication also ails e-payment systems. Even with the superior identity verificat

Democracy

       Democracy according to one time President of United States of America, Abraham Lincoln, is defined as government of the people, by the people and for the people.        Democracy is a system of government in which the election the electorates periodically vote to elect their representatives. The two types of democracy are Direct democracy and indirect democracy.         FEATURES OFDEMOCRACY 1. Government of the people, by the people and for the people 2. It is based on free and fair elections 3. Freedom of speech 4. It promotes equality before the law 5. Democracy tolerates the existence of opposition         MERITS OF DEMOCRACY 1. It promotes accountability of the leaders 2. It promotes freedom of expression 3. It promotes political stability in a country 4. It guarantees the supremacy of the constitution       DEMERITS OF DEMOCRACY 1. Democracy encourages lobbying among the elected representatives, thereby promoting corruption 2. Majority opinion is usually forced on the peopl