Skip to main content

Which is Correct: "Clap Him" or "Clap for Him"

WHICH IS CORRECT-CLAP HIM OR CLAP FOR HIM?

If you think ‘clap for him’ is correct but ‘clap him’ is not, this discourse is for you; if you think ‘clap for him’ sounds weird and ‘clap him” is the standard, this is also for you.

Confused? Don’t be. Take a deep breath and read on. We will look at how and where different speakers (who speak English as a primary language) use the above expression, with a new insight for everyone, no matter which style you use. Let’s get to it right away.

Every discourse I came across on this subject tends to be from a particular point of view (of a particular set of speakers), but we will pull them all together here. All facts are verifiable and credible.

‘Clap’ is both a noun and a verb. As a verb, it means to hit your hands together to make a short loud sound for attention, or admiration(applaud); to hit someone lightly to express pleasure; or to put someone or something somewhere quickly (e.g. They clapped him into the bunker). As a noun, it means the act of performing the above actions, or the sound of an explosion, especially thunder (e.g He was frightened by a clap of thunder).

The verb form of ‘clap’ in the context of ‘applaud’, used with or without ‘for’ + human names or personal pronouns (clap for + Nneka/him/her/them or clap + Nneka /him/her/them) is what has generated some divergence of opinions. The pattern is not the same for every native speaker of English because American English has a form of it and British has another, while Australians and Canadians follow one of these patterns, and one wonders why the other uses it differently. In British English (which we speak,) ‘clap’ is generally used without ‘for’ as a verb, but could be used with ‘for’ as a noun. This was directly confirmed by the British council and evident in the British National Corpus. Only one entry is found in the corpus where ‘clap’ (verb) was used with ‘for’ before a name (…let’s all clap for Neil…)

Examples:

1. We should clap Nefertiti for the accurate answer. (as a verb)

2. Let’s clap her for that wonderful performance. (as a verb)

3. Give a clap for Paul as he stands to discuss the subject. (as a noun)

In American English, as confirmed by native speakers and the Corpus of Contemporary American English, ‘clap for’ is both natural and acceptable.

Thus, the British form is not evident in the corpus.

Examples:

1. You can clap for me if you want to.

2. Christine decided to clap for the musician and we all joined to make him happy.

Similarly, the Corpus of Canadian English, The Australian Writer’s Marketplace Online and speakers from both countries (though Australia is also a continent) confirmed the use of ‘clap for’ naturally.

However, examples of ‘clap for’ (as used in American, Canadian and Australian English) are not seen in the Cambridge Dictionary, Oxford Dictionary, Macmillan Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Collins Dictionary. The related examples given are: clap him, clapped the marcher, clapped his performance, clapped for joy, etc.

Moreover, Cambridge Dictionary’s reply to my question was: "Yes, it does sound a little odd (the ‘for’ element). If you were asking an audience to applaud a guest, you’d more likely say something like ‘Please give x a big hand’ or ‘Please put your hands together for x’. You wouldn’t tend to use the word ‘clap’. If you were reporting what had happened, you would probably say something like ‘They clapped/applauded when x entered.’ So although ‘clap for’ isn’t absolutely wrong, it’s not quite natural sounding either.” Consequently, ‘give a big hand’, ‘a round of applause for’, ‘put your hands together for’, etc. have been suggested to escape this diversity, but we can’t run away from any aspect of language— it will always find us. In summary, these are the facts: renowned dictionaries support the British form as the standard (clap him/her; a clap for him/her) and find it unnatural to say ‘clap for him/her’; Americans, Canadians and Australians find it quite natural to say ‘clap for him/her’ and find the British form weird.

Now that you know…

Follow this blog website for more: Kingsleysunday430.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why did David Choose five smooth stones before going to fight Goliath?

Question: "Why did David choose five smooth stones before going to fight Goliath? Was David doubting God? Was it because Goliath had five brothers? Or, was David simply being prepared?" Answer:   Some presume that David took five smooth stones instead of just one because he had some doubt. However, there is no indication in the story of David and Goliath that by picking up five smooth stones instead of one that David was doubting God. Rather, David was simply being prepared. What if the Philistines attacked him after he killed Goliath? How would he have defended himself? David was simply being prepared when he took the four additional stones. Also, he couldn’t have known that one stone would be enough to kill the giant. God had not promised that David would kill Goliath with the first stone. David had experience in defending the sheep he guarded with his sling and stones. It would seem that the animals David had faced were far braver than the men with Goliath, because they al...

Health Benefits of Pawpaw leaves

If you don’t know the medicinal capacities of Papaya (Pawpaw leave) beyond being the leaf of a yellow fruit, then you are missing in action. It is strange that till today, many people who have pawpaw trees in their compounds don’t know how powerful the leaf is, as an alternative cure or treatment for many ailments. Save yourself of some hospital bills please and read this. Here are 5 Great Ailments that pawpaw leaf extract can help you fight naturally. 1. Cancer: Yes, Cancer, you heard me right.. If you are scared of cancer and you are looking for a natural shield to insure your health with, in a world full of many carcinogenic substances, then using papaya leaves will work well for you. While the antioxidants, digestive enzymes and other nutritional factors in papaya can provide protection against developing cancer, recent research studies are showing papaya leaves may have potential as a treatment for those already suffering from the disease. Research by Doctor Nam Dang at the Univer...

Nationalism In Nigeria

      Nationalism is the movement by people of patriotic feeling, devotions, principles and zeal towards the attainment of political, social, cultural and religious independence for a nation controlled by a foreign power. Even though the struggle for independence was nonviolent, it was not easily achieved. Great men of courage toiled and championed the course.       Those who actually fought and won independence for Nigeria are Known as Modern Nationalists.  EFFECTS OF NATIONALISM IN NIGERIA 1. Nationalism encouraged political education 2. It led to the emergence of powerful press 3. Nationalism led to the eventual attainment of self-governance 4. Motivated rapid constitutional conferences. 5. Nationalism led to Sovereignty